Republicans and Illegal Immigration: Waiting for the Next
Fort Sumter
Written by Robert
Klein Engler
Tuesday, September 07, 2004
During May of 1860, the Republican
National Convention was held in Chicago. The convention nominated Abraham
Lincoln to head the ticket as candidate for president. He won the
nomination on the third ballot. Lincoln would again face his old adversary
Stephen Douglas, who was the Democratic candidate.
How many at that Chicago
convention knew that in a few years the nation would be torn apart by the War
Between the States and in a few more years Lincoln would be assassinated? Who
knew then that many of the social problems born out of that war would still be
alive today? It is interesting to remember, too, that in Lincoln's time,
the War of 1812 was about as far from him as the Vietnam War is far from us,
today.
Although there was talk of
secession at the 1860 Chicago convention, few there ever thought the question of
slavery would lead to the battle of Fort Sumter in 1861, less than a year later.
In some ways the inability of those 19th Century politicians to see or
even control the events that lead up to the War Between the States is analogous
to the inability of our current politicians to see and understand the growing
tension that illegal immigration causes in our
society.
In our current election
year, illegal immigration--especially illegal immigration from Mexico--is the
one issue that neither Democrats nor Republicans want to face. In my
opinion, illegal immigration is to our time what secession and civil war was to
Lincoln's time. It is the violence looming on the horizon to
which politicians turn their back and wish would go away. Instead of
warning us about the damage that illegal immigration has done to the nation's
social fabric, the campaign for president has been so far about the Vietnam War
and the Swiftboat controversy. It is as if the Lincoln/Douglas debates
were about the War of 1812 instead of slavery.
There are many reasons why politicians in both parties do not
want to face the problem of illegal immigration. One reason is that it is
a problem which involves an unpopular solution. We need to detect, detain,
and deport millions. Who is willing to do that, at the moment? In
1860, few wanted to face the consequence of the abolitionist movement and
secession, either. Instead, because of their blindness, there was civil
war, social upheaval, and millions killed. So, today's politicians are
likewise reluctant to speak about the growing tension in our society that
threatens another war with Mexico.
Just as it was difficult for some politicians in 1860 to sense the depth and
concern of the abolitionists, so today, it is as difficult for some politicians
to sense the concern and anger of those who demand something be done about
illegal immigration. Right now, in Arizona, a primary fight in the
Republican Party is developing between a candidate who is following the White
House line of ''heads in the sand'' on the illegal immigration issue, and other
Republican challengers who want change. According to the Arizona Daily Star, Rep. Marian McClure of Tucson is
running for reelection, but is avoiding the illegal immigration issue. She
seems to have the support of so-called moderate Republicans and the White
House. Nevertheless, her opponents have different
priorities. ''Douglas Sposito, of Sonoita, wants to...clamp down on
businesses that hire illegal entrants. David Gowan, of Sierra Vista,
said...he wants the National Guard placed on the border to cut out illegal
border crossings.''
Ironically, as
these politicians debate, thousands of illegals continue to stream undetected
across the U. S./Mexico border each week into Arizona. Even in Illinois,
the state where Lincoln is buried, the tide of illegals from Mexico is rising.
In April, State Representative William Delgado (D) remarked, ''We are
pioneers. We might as well be in covered wagons because 10 years from now,
this state is brown.'' (VDare.com)
To remain ignorant of this threat to the union is to give new
meaning to the old Know Nothing Party. We will do well to remember, too,
that the pre-European Aztecs of Mexico were a brutal, bloody people without
violins, much like the Nazis who were a brutal, bloody people with
violins.
It is noteworthy that some
states are already adopting secessionist policies in regards to illegal
immigration. Illinois, for example, offers college tuition wavers to
illegals and Chicago is a sanctuary city, flaunting its disregard for federal
immigration laws. There is also a movement to give illegals in Illinois
drivers licenses the way 14 other states do. Many merchants in the
state--like banks and furniture stores--will accept also the Mexican
consular matricular card to open accounts, establish identity, buy
property, and get credit, instead of a valid U. S. Social Security card or state
ID.
Regrettably, at this time the
current leaders of the Republican party seem to be on the wrong side of the
immigration issue. Republicans today should be as strongly against illegal
immigration as Republicans in Lincoln's time were against slavery and for
preserving the union. Just as in 1860 when secession threatened the union,
so the union is threatened by illegal immigration today. Once the issue of
illegal immigration unites with Islamic terrorism, as it surely will, we can
expect a blow to our society equal to the firing on Fort Sumter. It is not
a question of why, but a question of when. Then, it may be another long
and violent road to a New Gettysburg.
About the Writer: Robert Klein Engler is an adjuct professor at
Roosevelt University in Chicago, and a versatile writer of op-ed articles,
poetry, and philosophy. His newest book, "A Winter of Words," is available from
amazon.com.